I got married recently and my hubby (Suraj) and I received quite a few presents. Good right? Well, the thing is, we did not expect them.
We went for a small wedding to reduce the ‘bhaar’ (load, burden) on others as well as ourselves. We don’t really want to continue with the way things are. We tried to show this through our wedding in terms of how we organised it but because of tradition, obligation or love we received presents.
This post isn’t about our wedding. It’s about something we call ‘vehvar’ in Gujarati.
What is vehvar? Well, it’s something that you give someone for an occasion, expecting them to reciprocate when you have a similar event of your own. This could be a regular occasion e.g. Diwali and birthdays or a ‘one off event’, such as, a wedding.
‘Vehvar varvanu’ refers to the expectation that it will be repaid/given back when the time is right.
Vehvar varvanu explained
In the past, if someone was really close to my mum, for example, they would show their love for her by giving me a present for an occasion like those mentioned above. Thus mum would keep track of who gave what and when so that she could give something back when appropriate. One expression of fondness/gratitude then becomes a cycle of giving and receiving.
When someone got married, it was traditional AND common for the parents to keep all the presents and then give them to their child and his/her spouse when there was a particular occasion OR use the gifts to help themselves when the time arose for them to give something back to the people who gave the presents in the first place.
A made up example – I got married and my mum’s really close to Chaya who gives me £21. Mum then gives Chaya’s child £21 when they marry unless £21 is worth a lot less when Chaya’s child marries. Most people used to give £5 when they attended a wedding or reception. Most people give £11 now because you can’t buy much £5 anymore.
Things have changed. Mostly, parents now give their children whatever gifts they receive.
Is it fair to impose a wedding list on your guests? I know of people who have put the details of their wedding list with the invite which would be fine if most of the items weren’t very costly. For example, attending a wedding and giving £11 is different to being given a wedding list where the cheapest item costs £25. That’s over double what you intended to give. Alternatively there may be an item that costs £2.50 but it only purchases one spoon. If you’re not comfortable with giving a few spoons and you want to give a set of 12, this would cost £18.
My cousin had a wedding list when he got married and I thought it was excellent! But he was my first cousin whom I considered to be my brother. I WANTED to give him and his wife a gift that they wanted, would use, would keep and would cherish. Money can get ‘lost’, in that it can be spent and you lose track of what you bought with it. This can be avoided if you earmark money for a specific thing so that you can think of the giver every time you use whatever you bought. Anyway I preferred to give them an item of their choice and I liked that they knew it’s from me. Is there a place for wedding lists? I think so but maybe the details should be given out if requested or to immediate family only. This would avoid placing bhaar on those who don’t want to or can’t give.
How does it become a cycle of giving and receiving?
It then gets passed down! Once the adults have died or are unable to continue with these expenses, it is expected that the children will take it on. The boys get off quite easily here because whether they are married or not and whether they live with their parent’s or not, they are classified as part of their parent’s household. Thus if their parents attend a wedding and give a present, the vehvar would count as being from the parents, sons, their wives etc.
Daughters are different!
However, once a daughter is married, she is classed as having a separate home. This can often mean that she is not invited to events that her brothers may be invited to. The need to cut numbers and keep the relationships considered when deciding who to invite minimal; often means that married daughters are left out. That means no vehvar right? Well yes, BUT if she is invited, she isn’t perceived as being included in the present that her parents give. Thus she’ll need to give her own gift or break tradition and give nothing.
This also branches out to invites. We went to a reception and witnessed someone jokingly telling someone else that she was waiting for her invite to his son’s wedding. You see, her child had recently got married and they invited the whole of his family. His son is now getting married and they have cut costs and guests so they haven’t invited them at all. She is offended, he feels bad, expectations have not been met. Of course, on the other hand you can organise whatever you want and you can make it as grand as you want. However, for the longest time I’ve believed that organise/buy what you can afford or you go without. Would you want to get into debt so that you can ‘payback’ an invite? It’s not as simple as this. There are issues about the bride/groom not wanting all these people there because they don’t know them! Even if they were invited to this lady’s child’s wedding, it was because the parents know each other, so why should they reciprocate? This is not a clear cut issue. It is very often emotional and therefore difficult. However, I have mentioned it in this post because the invite counts as a vehvar in the sense that people often expect an invite back.
So why want to reduce the giving and receiving that we are involved with.
All of the above and more wanted us to stop partaking in this.
We wanted to reduce the bhaar on others. One less present/cost for the ‘giver’ right?
We’re not sure if we’ll be in a position to reciprocate. We don’t want to take with one hand and give nothing back with the other.
We may not want to reciprocate.
Is it not a good idea to liberate our offspring from all this?
A bit more about how it all works
Often the eldest son gives and he will put the names of his younger brothers and sisters on the envelope/present even though they haven’t contributed. Is this fair?
Within families, traditionally, elder siblings give to their younger brothers and sisters but will not accept from them. This means the eldest has to shell out a lot but gets nothing back. Is this fair? The other siblings will receive something from those who are elder to them but the firstborn wont have anyone older to spoil them.
Of course, someone would need to keep a tally of it all and people are often offended when they don’t receive what they expect.
A colleague of mine was talking to me about a birthday party she’s arranging for her son. She gets invited to lots of parties and she attends. Can you imagine what she’s thinking about? How can she leave them out when she arranges her son’s party? How much will it cost to include all these friends, their partners and their children? She doesn’t have a huge family but her hubby does so they all need to be invited too. If she has it at home, there’s no room so they’ll need a marquee. If not, should she hire a hall? Catering. Decorations. Parking. So many things to consider! Another form of vehvar.
What about receiving a present you don’t want? I remember receiving many presents that I would not wear, use or display. I am not ungrateful. I’m just being honest. I used to keep all these things through fear of offending the giver. Can you imagine the clutter? 🙂 Now I give it to a shop that raises money for charity or I give it to my mum to give to other people for her ‘vehvar varvanu’. In my mind, it’s such a shame. A waste of the ‘givers’ time in buying it and the money that they spent on it too.
So what do you think? Continue? Stop? Is there a middle ground?